Random Thoughts

How come "Ali Queda" appears in every place where Americans go into? How come bombings begin to occur in ALL the places Americans invade? There was NO "Ali Queda" in Iraq before the US invasion. There was NO bombings either and no fighting between Sunni and SHiiti. There were NO bombings in Pakistan up until recently.


Even if Warming and cooling is All natural and cyclical and has nothing to do with human activity at all that doesn't mean it will NOT severely affect human society and all of our lives and most importantly, our ability to grow enough food to feed ourselves. Saying it's all natural and cyclical and all good doesn't fix the problem is growing food. Cooling is actually much worse than warming.

Bible makes a LOT of sense, yes. Entity makes a mud pie man, doesn’t think about reproduction till later, fabricates a female out of the man’s side, the entity knows in advance that the created couple are going to screw up big time, blames them for his flawed design. Do I even need to talk about the talking serpent? Later said entity battles with sea monsters. Later said entity throws thunderbolts blows smoke
out of nostrils, causes volcanic activity where there is no evidence of such.

For all the blame Nixon took and was turned into devil incarnate he did a LOT of thing USA should be grateful about: stopped the VietNam war, opened up the path to China, severed the tie between the dollar and gold thus giving the USA the ability to print as much money as it needs and signed up a threaty with Bregneff about cutting long range missiles.


Thomas Sowell STILL has't bothered to reply to my email where i asked for evidence of the fabled Iranian "nuclear program". Oh well, I guess who am I, right?

Thomas Sowell update part 1

I found Sowell's email address and sent him an email on Wednesday, asking him to present me with the proof he has that Iran has a hidden/illegal "nuclear weapons program". It's now Saturday and of course NO email whatsoever. yeah, what a surprise.

Thomas Sowell: Yet another house boy

I began reading Thomas Sowell's columns as an intellectual exercise yesterday. It
took a whole lot of will power forcing myself to keep up reading obvious garbage..
And he is supposed to be a high level intellectual, a at several universities and
clleges? If this is the best a supposed intellectual giant like him can produce?
No wonder he has been reduced to a house boy role, defending Pills Limbaugh
against charges of racism. Wow, is the guy senile or a total sell-out? Or both?
Whatever its content's, the guy is clever and can write. As normal practice, he
takes a little bit of truth, half lies, a lot of innuendos, outright lies and
mixers them in such a manner that resulting concussion is imposable to
separation lies and truth. As a right wing conservative, he is 100% boringly
predicable in what He peaches: the phantom never existing "free market" and what
he attacks: the ever present liberals, the phantom liberal media, EVERYTHING Mr
Change and does and say and any form of communism/socialism.

Anyway, i will write an article that will discuss Sowell's writings. It won't be a any type of strenuous intellectual exercise because is arguments are surprisingly easily defeated.

Payback is a bitch, eh?

The hottest topic on the left and right wing blogs is the upcoming Copenhagen meeting in December. Everyone from Alex Jones to is giving their "expert" option on the subject and as usual, spreading as MUCH FUD as they possibly can. Some are saying ridiculous things such as Obama will sell our country (meaning USA), others are screaming about the beginning of World Government that will be able to tell everyone what to do or not to do essentially controlling al the countries in the world. I just ran across a blog where they said:
start quote: The treaty will also allow the distribution of wealth from developed countries like the U.S. to Third World Countries like Africa, in other words; taxpayer-funded socialist welfare! end quote.

Excellent! And that is exactly how it should be. It's about time.

+++++++++++++++
NOTE:Let me just say dividing the world into 1st, 2nd and 3rd world is racist and derogatory, but I will use it here for the sake of argument.
+++++++++++++++

For centuries the so called "1st world" countries have been exploiting the so called "3rd world" countries. has anybody even done any type of maybe calculation how much wealth for example flowed form India into UK? Or how many people were forcefully taken from Africa to work in South and North America essentially giving US free labor force?? Can somebody maybe calculate the value of all that land that was stolen from Native Americans by white settlers? Why all the silence all of a sudden?
So it was fine and dandy for wealth in form of ore, gold, iron, spices, silk, whatever you can think of etc, etc, etc flowed form the so called "3rd world" countries into the so called '1st world" countries starting form about 14 century and going into the 20th century but it's not fine and dandy get get SOME kind of payment back? Whaat?? I caan't hear you!

Second, the "1st world" countries have been polluting freely for a long long time and NOBODY ever could tell them anything. That is about to end, finally! And YES they should pay the exploited "3rd world" countries. After all, what's fair is fair. You got a problem with that?

Poor USA, ALWAYS getting attacked

Reading up on USA's history, a strange pattern emerges. It seems USA is a magnet
for attacks! Several major wars have been started because USA has been attacked
so many times in the past. Let's count them all:

1. USA/Spanish war started with the surprise attack on the ship The Main that was
in Cuba.

2. USA entered the WWII after the surprise(again) attack on the USA navy in Pearl
Harbor. Many many articles have been written proving that USA KNEW and basically
put their navy at pear harbor practically inviting Japan to attack it after
singing documents stopping Japan's flow of raw material.


3. USA/Vietnam war started after (again!) a surprise attack on ship that was in
the Vietnam waters. There been many questions surrounding this and weave found people lied about it; no Viet boats were seen

4. The "war on terror", oops that term is not being used anymore began when USA
was attacked by Al Queda.

Ok, once I understand. Twice, maybe. Three times i get suspicious. But 4 times
attacked? Sorry but that is too much of a useful coincidence the USA government
would use.

And the sheep looked up

One of my favorite sci fi books of all time is a little known already out of print masterpiece by John Brunner called "The sheep looked up." I bought it secondhand and loved it. it deals with a sudden and rapid deterioration of the environment in USA and around the world in the near future due to ALL the "economic activity" humans have been doing ever since the begining of the industrial revolution and throwing tons of various poisons into the surrounding environment. Brunner is somewhat of a major prophet to me, for example he single handedly predicted the Internet in all its glory in 1975's "Shockwave Rider". But never mind all that; what's important is the name of the novel: "The Sheep looked up". And Im beginning to see not the sheep looking up but more honesty and outright telling the truth(partial but that's a start at least) on USA TV and even on places I would never imagine such as Faux news. Even Glen beck was surprisingly honest on a recent show while discussing the rummor that Arabs, Japanese and Russians are in secret negotiations to drop the dollar as a currency for oil. Beck admitted several facts I have known for a long time: That Reagan was basically bluffing with his missile defense system A.K.A. Star Wars and that Bin Alladin was yes a CIA agent and on their payroll whose job was the fight the Russians during the 1980s. Made my jaw fall to the floor I tell ya.
later on, I saw a commentator asking for the abolishing of the federal Reserve on Faux news. that amazed me even more.

Heat wave in Southern California; 100 degrees in Oxnard, why isnt Rivero from whatreallyhappened.com linking to that?

While Rivero from whatreallyhappened.com is very quick to link to ANY news items talking about early snow fall, why isn't he linking to the report from the LA Times about the heat wave and 100 degrees temperatures in Southern California? Seems he is quick to try to disprove global warming but when news speak against him he is mum on the subject. Of course, no surprise there.